Fallacies of Ambiguity

COFFEE.jpg (2219 bytes)




		Fallacies of Ambiguity involve some confusion over meaning. Interpreted in one way the argument has a false major premiss, while interpreted in the other way the argument has a false minor premiss. (If we try to interpret both premisses so that they are true, then the "argument" fails to be formally valid.) Here is an obvious example: All beetles have six legs. John Lennon is a Beatle. Hence, John Lennon has six legs. Since the location of the fallacy is a matter of interpretation, we cannot classify the argument either as a major-premiss fallacy or as a minor-premiss fallacy. Hence such fallacies get their own group.
The fallacies in the Ambiguities category are... Equivocation Amphiboly Distributive Fallacy a. Composition b. Division

Go to: WELCOME EXPLANATION of PRINCIPLES TABLE of FALLACIES EXERCISES INDEX