
|
|
Dicto Simpliciter -
Secundum Quid
(Destroying the Rule, i.e. Reverse Accident) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
The argument exploits an over-simplistic or unqualified
statement of a rule to argue, based on what should be recognized as a valid
exception to that rule, that the rule should be rejected altogether. |
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
The Latin phrase "secundum quid" is complicated. In this
context, "secundum" means "according to" rather than "following after"
(which is its more usual meaning). "Quid" means "something," i.e. some
particular thing. Hence, the phrase means "according to the particular
case." |
|
|
|
|
Examples: |
|
|
|
|
"Did you see that ambulance run that red light? Clearly, people can
drive any way they like around here." |
|
|
|
|
"I don't see why we have to have class every day this week. Last
week we got out one day because of that bad snow storm." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification: A deductive fallacy of soundness, with a falsehood in the
major premiss, in the Middle Ground Fallacies family. |
|
|
|
|
Source: Aristotle, Sophistical
Refutations 5 (167a: 1 - 20). Aristotle described the fallacy, but called it "unqualified
generalization." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go to: WELCOME
EXPLANATION
of PRINCIPLES TABLE of FALLACIES EXERCISES
INDEX
|