|
|
If it is a bad idea to accept a position merely because it is popular,
it is an even worse idea to accept a position merely because it is unpopular. Yet
Americans (at least) are strongly attracted to this pattern of reasoning, and advertisers
are happy to exploit our attraction. Psychologically, the fallacy plays upon the desire to
be above the crowd, better than others, a leader rather than a follower. People who
pride themselves on being rational are much more likely to fall into this fallacy than
they are to fall into its opposite, the Appeal to Popularity. The reason is not just that
people who try to be rational have a stronger desire to be individualists (although this
may be true). The reason is, rather, that being "rational" requires thinking
arguments through for oneself. Thinking things through for yourself may lead you
to unique insights. It may give you things to say about a subject other than what everyone
else is saying. Hence it is often a good indication that someone has thought a position
through when he take a view that is not just like the mainstream view.
However, because it is true that people who take unusual positions have often thought
deeply about the matter, a person who has not thought a position through may appear to be
more thoughtful merely by holding positions that are unusual and eccentric. That is,
holding unusual positions may create the illusion that you have thought things through,
even if you have not.
The fallacy of Appeal to Rugged Individualism is always ironically self-limiting. We
attempt to persuade in order to get others to agree with our opinions. Imagine everyone
adopting a certain position on the grounds that it was unpopular - only to discover that
everyone else has also adopted the view for the same reason! Fortunately,
thinking things through for yourself does not mean holding unpopular beliefs; it means
holding whatever beliefs reason leads you to, whether they are popular or not. |